Bad Archaeology

There is enough bad science, history, and archaeology out there to build any theory that can be conceived.  I don’t have access to television regularly but when I do, I am ashamed to be from the same species that created Fox News, TLC, or the History Channel.  I am also astonished at the number of people I have met lately who genuinely think that “scientists” or “archaeologists” are covering up an enormous prehistory of the world for some poorly explained reason like “it would upset the status quo”.  I can guarantee that when and if we (archaeologists) find anything new, controversial, or just plain cool, the last thing we are going to do is keep it under our hat.  Just look at the Clovis/pre-Clovis debates and the excitement generated by any new claim.  Yes, there are those who don’t like to change what they believe mid-life but this certainly isn’t any reason to not report on interesting new facts.

If Bad Archaeology is a peeve or just holds an interest for you there is an excellent website with an updated blog on the subject.  It is, in fact, called “BAD ARCHAEOLOGY“.

Or look at the blog here: http://badarchaeology.wordpress.com/

A quote from their home page:

“Bad Archaeology is the brainchild of a couple of archaeologists who are fed up with the distorted view of the past that passes for knowledge in popular culture. We are unhappy that books written by people with no knowledge of real archaeology dominate the shelves at respectable bookshops. We do not appreciate news programmes that talk about ley lines (for example) as if they are real.

In short, we are Angry Archaeologists.”

Advertisements

About George Crawford

archaeologist, archer, primitive technologist, and wannabee musician ... mostly
This entry was posted in Archaeology, biblical archaeology, pseudoscience and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Bad Archaeology

  1. daithi82 says:

    As a medieval historian I can’t tell you how many times I have wanted to strangle some supposed expert for spouting nonsense conspiracy theories. I definitely welcome a site like this.

    • paleotool says:

      Agreed. I was in a “conversation” about alleged cover-ups of several million year old human remains in Arizona but it became clear that the more reason I used, the more it became clear that I was part of the conspiracy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s